15 Comments

Chris made some mistakes in his analysis. He correctly noticed that shot 3 was not in sync, and then says that shot 6 is off by the same amount. But shot six appears to be off by more than shot 3, if I understand what he is saying. I saw a video this morning that featured a lady who was sure the shots came from Trump's left. The bullet trajectories should say a lot about where the shooters were positioned. There is also talk of someone being up on the water tower. I sure wish we could get a "bullet acoustics" expert to analyze all of the videos

Expand full comment

Something tells me with the same FBI that raided Mara largo, gave Hillary a pass, and never wanted to look at the laptop from Hell, we’ll never get to the bottom of this. Oh and did I mention persecuting J6ers.

Expand full comment

Agreed …

Listen to the popping (bullets), anyone with firearms experience can tell you…. Chris is right.

Expand full comment

Something that should be considered is the variability in the muzzle velocity from cartridge to cartridge within a box of ammunition, fired out of the same gun. It can vary at much as 30 feet per second or more. I don't know how significant this is, but it seems it should be addressed.

See this video of chronograph tests of the ammunition type used by the shooter.

https://youtu.be/Q4Xfr18-HVw?si=iz5GXrjJM5q7p4qA

Expand full comment

@I_Am_JohnCullen for the earliest and most thorough analysis of available video and audio from that day. Suggest people examine the data themselves.

Expand full comment

The entire event was a staged psyop.

No one was shot. No one was killed.

It was not a real Trump rally, it was a staged production.

From what I have seen there were not thousands of people there,

like Trump described in his acceptance speech.

There was a rent-a-crowd behind Trump's podium,

huddled together to make it look like a big crowd.

There just happened to be a photographer in exactly the right

place to capture epically composed Pulitzer Prize material photos

of Trump's defiant fist in the air moment.

Meanwhile, after a barrage of shots fired from who knows where, the crowd just stands around

filming with their cellphones.

The only interview of a witness was done by the BBC, with an actor in front of a green screen.

Watch the video, and the bad crisis acting is apparent.

The narrative is as nonsensical as 9/11.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-live-trump-holds-rally-in-western-pennsylvania-days-before-the-rnc

Expand full comment

Inside job alright...but it's even more "inside" than the narrative you're pushing here.

Expand full comment

A Uni Party Production!

Expand full comment

Bingo buddy.

Expand full comment

Check out this link for more discussion.

The "sound" info mentioned early on in the discussion (a few minutes in with graphs showing "line of site") is compelling that the bullets emanated from more than one weapon. The first three shots were spaced in time sequentially and they sounded a bit "muffled"....the next five shots or so were erratic and sounded more "out in the open". It is compelling evidence.

https://www.sott.net/article/493339-NewsReal-Trump-Survived-Deep-State-Hit-Job-For-Higher-Purpose

Expand full comment

Also ... We still have many unanswered questions about the ladder that was found feet from the point of the roof where Crooks seemingly gained access ... and the five-foot ladder he reportedly bought at Home Depot that morning - which has never been discovered.

https://billricejr.substack.com/p/a-ladder-could-be-smoking-gun-of

Expand full comment

Yes, when was the ladder placed and who placed it. That needs to be answered.

Expand full comment

Yep. Just two questions: Who placed this ladder in this location and when was it placed here?

Also, if Security knew they had a ladder so close to the spot where the shooter fired from, why didn't law enforcement quickly use this ladder to confront the shooter?

Expand full comment

There is a story of a local police crawling up and down the ladder after confronting the shooter just moments before the shooter fired in Trump’s general direction. The local police force got flack for the officer not having a loaded firearm pointed at the potential threat when he reached the top of the ladder.

Expand full comment

That version of events later changed significantly. The new version does plausibly explain why this officer didn't fire any shots - he fell off the roof and hadn't climbed up a ladder - He had been boosted or hoisted onto the roof by a second officer and just managed to pull himself up over the roof line. He was using both hands to get a peak over the roof and thus could reach for a gun.

Expand full comment