Not to beat a dead horse, but...

I had to wait until after Christmas to post this one..

Background you must know for my comment to make sense (From Steve Kirsch’s substack entitled, “Celine Dion was likely disabled from a KNOWN SIDE EFFECT of the COVID vaccine.”

So for a “safe” vaccine like the flu vaccine (which I’m not conceding is safe, but just for the sake of argument), we’d get 1 report in 30 years (.03/yr). For COVID, we get 17 reports in 2 years (8.5/yr). So the relative rate increase is 8.5/.03 = 283.

In other words, math says that the chance that Celine Dion got SPS from the vaccine is 99.6%.

In short, it is almost certain that Celine Dion is vaccine injured.

My Comment: Just to get this out of the way before someone makes a big deal out of it, The actual relative rate increase is 255, not 283. Steve got 283 because he did some rounding off that was not necessary. His point remains the same.

Here's a more important issue: Why quote Dr. Aseem Malhoutra? He pushed the vaccines and even admonished people for questioning vaccine safety and efficacy only later to change his mind. He was lazy and careless with people's lives at first and got some of them killed. Then he took it upon himself to actually look at the data after his father died and realized he was wrong. Now he has become a media darling, getting interviewed by Tucker and going on a speaking tour in the USA. Meanwhile, I have been right on EVERYTHING from the beginning, the first on 17 major calls and the only on 4 and I can't get an interview after writing a unique and important book. Sorry but you can't murder someone and then change your mind later and get to go on a speaking tour, making a lot of money off your crimes.

( JUst to explain how I got 255. There are 15 untis of 2 years in 30 years. Thus the relative rate increase is 15 x 17 = 255 (Steve rounded 1/30 to .03. It is actually .033333333…))