260 Comments

Yeah. There was no pandemic.

Expand full comment

No there wasn't. It is biological warfare and our tax dollars paid for it.

Expand full comment

Good point that not enough people think about. If our tax-payer money funded this "mad science" and actually created this virus, would the people who were responsible want anyone to know they were responsible? My answer: Probably not.

Thus the "bat/natural origin" theory made sure nobody even thought about the possibility this virus might have been created by scientists working for the U.S. government (and partnering with China scientists for some inexplicable reason).

The accepted origins narrative kept any real virus origin sleuths from looking at other origin theories. A couple of these theories might be that the virus was already spreading well before the Wuhan outbreak and/or that maybe the WIV should not be the ONLY lab suspect where this virus might have originated and escaped.

The disinformation narrative that "took" kept people from looking at other real suspects, including people/officials with the U.S. government. To this day, except for maybe Rand Paul, nobody is looking into that possibility.

... And even Rand Paul ignores the copious evidence of Covid cases around the world that occurred well before the Wuhan outbreak.

Expand full comment

I believe the virus had spread around the world by early September 2019, probably originating in August or before. And not necessarily in Wuhan, but who knows? There were a lot of cases in the middle of the United States in the fall 2019 that were very similar to Covid, but dismissed by the authorities in retrospect and they claim they can find no blood samples that far back with Covid, which I don't believe. My sister reported there were such cases in Oklahoma. I, in South Florida, believe I acquired Covid in mid-September 2019 that lasted three weeks. I was very sick, starting with a tickle in my throat, and a dry cough that tickled my throat to the point I choked, which lasted a week, although I had no other respiratory issues. But I couldn't eat or drink anything for three days, maybe starting the evening of the first day, I felt extremely heavy and fatigued, and slept a lot, and when I tried to drink water after a few days it tasted very strange. Slowly after several days I started taking some soup. I lost 12 pounds in 10 days. But it was pretty much over after three weeks. I was not vaccinated and I have never come down with Covid after that, although I did have some sort of cold once or twice after couple years, but it wasn't Covid. One of the most common Covid symptoms, which most media did not report, inexplicably, is loss of appetite, which happens in maybe 50% of people, and that lasts from several days to a week, generally the longer period if you're older.

Expand full comment

Infectious clones Bill. That's likely how it was done.

Expand full comment

If it existed at all --"Covid would have come and gone without anyone noticing if the government hadn't gotten involved with the idiotic policies some of which were put in place by people who knew better" I requested this -

(A)ll studies and/or reports in the possession, custody or control of Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and/or the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) describing the purification of any “COVID-19 virus” (including “B.1.1.7”, “B.1.351”,”P.1” and any other variant) (via maceration, filtration and use of an ultracentrifuge; also referred to at times by some people as”isolation”), directly from a sample taken from a diseased human, where the patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material (i.e. monkey kidney cells aka vero cells; fetal bovine serum). Please note that I am not requesting studies/reports where researchers failed to purify the suspected “virus” and instead: - cultured an unpurified sample or other unpurified substance, and/or- performed an amplification test (i.e.PCR test) on all the RNA from a patient sample from a cell culture, or on Genetic material from any purified substance, and/or-sequenced the total RNA from a patient sample or from a cell culture or from any unpurified substance, and/or- produced electron microscopy images of unpurified things.

The CDC answered with the statement we can't do that. Transmission of an illness from person to person has never been proven to exist either Check- https://www.ggarchives.com/Influenza/TheRosenauExperiment-1918-1919.html

Expand full comment

Perhaps such illnesses are caused by an imbalance in the four humors.

Expand full comment

I await the news that the virus was in motion by April '19, based on an 'idiopathic' bug I experienced. And continue to experience the results thereof.

Expand full comment

Do you happen to live near a US government biohazard labs or university virus research centers?

Expand full comment

Worked less than 2 miles from from Merck Lansdale Pa, and also about 3 hr from Fort Detrick.

Expand full comment

Or maybe it isn’t a virus. Flaws In The Coronavirus Pandemic Theory http://saveelsobrante.net/CoronavirusPanic.pdf

Expand full comment

I believe it was you that reported on the early spread and tests done on blood bank samples showing the virus was active before the Wuhan market outbreak. That makes the release intentional, not accidental.

When you add the Event 201 story, you have pre-meditation (beyond the development of the virus). Then look at the WEF (who sponsored event 201) founders book "the great reset" and see him make comments about "we can't waste the pandemic" and the "opportunities for profit in rebuilding", you have a complete picture of the Motive, Means and Opportunity. All in plain sight.

Expand full comment

There a reports on two blood samples in Italy from early October 2019 that showed the virus, which means the patients were infected in September. Some researchers used a type of regressive genetic analysis used to determine the aggressiveness of cancer, applied to the virus, and concluded that it had spread around the world by October 2019, and likely arose in Wuhan in August 2019. Other research of the activity of hospitals in Wuhan, and perhaps the research Institute, saw an uptick of activity, I believe in October 2019. They also earlier were reportedly doing similar gain-of-function research at a couple of facilities in the USA, I think a Government level 4 biosafety lab in Texas and at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Expand full comment

Sounds like Mother Goose and flying pink unicorns. Makes for some good fairy Tales, since the proof of the existence of a virus is as illusive as that unicorn.

Expand full comment

Talk about fairy tales...

Expand full comment

The pandemic arrived when the "covid deaths" in northern Italy arrived. That event (almost all iatrogenic) ramped up the fear 100-fold. The Diamond Princess outbreak was also key for the same reason.

Nobody asks why weren't these spikes in deaths occurring in December 2019 or January 2020. All I can figure is that most people don't think "early spread" was happening. They buy the official narrative that "late spread" actually happened. Per the authorized narrative ,this virus exploded (and/or became lethal) in late February and early March (which has never happened before with a respiratory virus).

The "late spread" disinformation project ... worked. People bought it.

Expand full comment

Excepting a pandemic of child abuse. Shame on the cowardly adults in this country who robbed children of two years of the gift of childhood.

Expand full comment

What might have bumped up our numbers was the absurd wearing of masks when infected. The last thing you want to do with a respiratory virus is to inhale contaminated air from the infected nasopharynx directly into the lungs.

Expand full comment

The mask were needed to enhance the fear factor even more.

Expand full comment

And the alienation and depersonalization on a societal scale.

Expand full comment

Yes... I always felt that but people would give me the dirty look when I questioned the masks back in 2020!

Expand full comment

Whenever I talk to a normie sheeple and they start regurgitating the mainstream narrative, I don't counter them. I simply ask, "How do you explain the data out of Sweden?" None of them are familiar with the data. A tiny percentage of them want to know. These are the people who can see reason when presented with real data. However, the majority are permanent useful idiots, who always resort to ad hominem attacks.

Expand full comment

The Approved Narrative about Sweden is that the citizens "obeyed" the recommendations without being forced to by the State--they socially distanced, wore masks, kept their kids home, whatever--and were healthier to begin with.

Somebody with some extra time & money and whatever entre necessary to get access in Sweden ought to do some rigorous random sampled surveying about adherence to these recommendations (it'd be good to get info on how hospitalized COVID patients were treated as well). Of course, people capable of the mendacity we've seen in the public health establishment over the past four years won't be budged, but others might. But it'd help to have some results like "85% of Swedes reported intermittent compliance w/ xxx recommendations from 2020-23." And maybe we'd be surprised. Assuming the result wouldn't be from biased self-image sensitive reporting or faulty memory--real threats to validity--maybe 85% of Swede adults will report wearing an n-95 mask in all social situations for 18 months. Maybe their hospitals never used Ivermectin or HQ and quickly ventilated patients with mild hypoxia.

If there are data out there, I hope someone reports on it in the COVID-critical sphere.

Expand full comment

I just remember seeing photos of Swedes sitting in bars enjoying themselves as usual while everyone in our country was huddled at home.

Expand full comment

that's what I remember MOST about Sweden and the craziness going on... that they were doing normal things and living and the US was doing insane things and dying ....

Expand full comment

For the most part, the same thing was happening in Florida. I live in neigbboring Alabama and I know that our lockdowns and mask-wearing were 20 times more extreme than those in Florida. But there was no difference in Covid cases, hospitalizations and deaths between the two states. In fact, I think Alabama was worse than Florida on all three metrics.

And young people were still going to Florida's beaches and not masking up or socially distancing ... and these young visitors weren't dying or being hospitalized.

Since Florida has one of the oldest mean ages of any state, Florida should have had five times as many Covid deaths as states with much younger populations. This didn't happen either.

The Alabama-Florida comparison should also be studied. I live 2 hours from the beaches of the Florida panhandle. My neighbors were flocking to these beaches for a weekend of normalcy. They weren't coming back dead or sick.

Expand full comment

The media may have exaggerated their coverage of Swedes acting like Covid didn't exist in order to shame them, make them look stupid or selfish. So, hard to know what percentage may have voluntarily sheltered in place, etc.

Expand full comment

Yes, the media were certainly trying to make the Swedes look stupid or selfish so that other nations didn't get too many ideas about resisting the nonsense.

The main issue for Sweden was the lockdown of care homes where residents were neglected. Some may have been 'euthanized' for all we know.

Expand full comment

It was the control group which the wise would question as to why so many people locked themselves down, believing the lies. In the UK it was all guidance anyway for anyone lacking common sense, which most did.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/g-is-forguidance

Expand full comment

The average age of death for a Swedish Covid victim was at least 82 - at or beyond the normal life expectancy of a Swedish citizen.

People in Sweden did die "with or from" Covid - because Sweden was administering the PCR tests as well. However, look it up, almost nobody in Sweden under the age of 50 died from or with Covid in late March or April 2020.

The Covid deaths in Sweden were iatrogenic too. But this virus didn't kill the middle aged or young in Sweden ... and Sweden was not locked down and very few Swedish citizens were wearing masks non-stop.

If Sweden was the poster case for what NOT to do in a pandemic, this nation would have had a massive spike in deaths for all ages of its citizens ... and this didn't happen.

Expand full comment

Okay now let’s talk about how many people have died as a result of taking the jab!!!

Expand full comment

We can't talk about that. It's a taboo subject that can't be fairly or honestly investigated - just like cases that would prove or "confirm" early spread. "Don't/never investigate that which you don't want to confirm." This has been the m.o. of our "leaders" all along. Why wouldn't it be? This tactic works every time.

Expand full comment

We can look at VAERS which is under reported, but in the same respect under reported for all vaccines. If you do a search today for all deaths from all vaccines, grouped by vaccine and manufacturer, you will see that 90% of all deaths from all vaccines in recorded history come from the Covid vaccines.

Side effects that lead to an early death are even more numerous.

Expand full comment

Yes, we can't talk about it because we might be about to start WW3 over far less deaths than our western governments have been complicit in on home soil.

Expand full comment

And even those deaths were mainly caused by hospital protocol.

Expand full comment

This should be the MAIN take-away. This explains or gave the "sheeple" their reason to panic and thus go along with all the lockdowns and then the "warp speed" mRNA vaccines. Also, the orchestrators of the "pandemic" needed the dubious/bogus PCR deaths to "prove" all these deaths came from a novel virus.

Expand full comment

I don't think anyone died of, from, or with it because I don't think there was really a novel coronavirus stalking the land. The flu effectively disappeared for three years, and since no one has ever listed a "covid" symptom that isn't also a flu or cold symptom, Occam says they were flu deaths. I think Mike Yeadon's right: There was no pandemic because there was no novel virus.

But let's say there was. According to the CDC, "covid" is 72 times less likely to kill the average American than a car accident is (and 1,600 times less likely to kill than cancer or heart disease/stroke). About 40,000 people die in MVAs annually and at least 97% of PCR positives are false at 40+ Ct. According to English major logic and my crayon-drawn pie chart, that comes to around 500 deaths/year. Factor in the straight-up lying by the financially incentivized and I can get that down to zero. And anyway, the fact that they lied so relentlessly about cause of death is reason enough to dismiss *all* their "covid deaths" data as hopelessly corrupt.

Finally, in 2021 I looked up the total deaths/year in the US going back about ten years. Every other year-to-year increase was higher than that between 2019 vs 2020, and no one claimed that there was a pandemic in any of those years. That's how those of us who count on our fingers figured it out.

Expand full comment

There was no novel coronavirus as the novel was only a make believe novel, a story from start to finish.

Coronaviruses are virologists way of justifying their jobs and big pharma's business, make it up and scare people to death or at least to run onto the vaccine needles and pharma's arms. My latest post is on Christian Drosten, the German variety of virolo-gits.

Expand full comment

The rest were killed by ventilators and Remdesivir or the vaccine. Did anyone die of actual Covid? Its looking less and less likely, even tho so many are convinced that doctors cant be wrong or wouldnt do anything nefarious when hundreds of thousands of dollars are involved per death.

Expand full comment

For your monday consideration, a Colorado Coroner chastised doctors for classifying two gunshot victims as Covid related deaths. So what killed them, the covid or the bullet?

Expand full comment

And imagine how many we dont know about.

Expand full comment

Reid, this has been distributed to the Brownstone authors group. It is important. First couple heads that saw it responded with comments like "really remarkable". So we will see how much we can leverage this epistle.

Expand full comment

Thank you very much, Dr.. I hope they reprint it. I'll ask Jeffrey to look out for it. It IS important. What a nothing burger!

Expand full comment

Reid, as I noted in a separate comment, Malone picked it up from that posting. Great additional exposure. Congratulations. Now we should discuss why you are not using HI-Opt 2!!

Expand full comment

I’m not aware of any other Covid skeptic who has asked this question: WHY would it be so important to push the start date of virus spread back several months? 

In this speculative deep dive, I identified several possible answers to this question. Two of the most important: The directors of this production HAD to have a big spike in deaths to provoke the fear they needed ... and they had to have that PCR test.

https://billricejr.substack.com/p/the-pandemics-start-date-had-to-be?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

Expand full comment

Dear Bill

I saw your name here so popped in this reader comment from another substack. The key is in the first sentence. France took HCO off the over the counter list in October 2019. The timing seems odd and may fit in with the concept that this was a plandemic not a pandemic. A little digging might also yield that perhaps people were using HCO earlier than 2020 and perhaps supplies were dwindling. Thought you might be interested.

Debra Nolasco

11 mins ago

Speaking of France & HCQ, here is some interesting information: HCQ was an OTC in France until October 2019 (take note of the timing). When the virus hit France, Dr. Didier Raoult started treating patients with covid in Marseille with HCQ until the government made it exceedingly difficult for him to do so. Turns out that the French hematologist, politician, & ex-health minister, Agnes Buzyn's 2nd husband, Yves Levy (a French physician, researcher, & former CEO of INSERM) (French Institute of Health & Medical Research), is not on good terms with Dr. Didier Raoult. When Dr. Vladimir Zelenko started treating his patients in Orange County, NY with HCQ/Azithromycin/Zinc, (with much success) in the spring of 2020, it was, in part, due to his knowledge of Dr. Raoult's success with it in France. By the time Dr. Zelenko died in June of 2022, he & his team had successfully treated approximately 7,000 patients with his protocol, which evolved over time to include Ivermectin & other re-purposed medications. The sad truth is that most western governments did not want its citizens to have access to life-saving medication. They wanted them to believe that the "vaccine" was the only answer. Sounds like pre-meditated murder to me. And...the whole thing in France is highly suspicious to me.

Expand full comment

That was a great summary, Fred. You nailed it.

Expand full comment

They forbid treatments that worked and then they mandated "treatments" (via new Covid protocols) that also killed people. The panic/fear also contributed to this massive new spike in "Covid deaths." These combinations produced the "fear" that underpinned or justified everything that followed.

Many doctors also quit prescribing antibiotics for people with pneumonia or ARDS and later signed off on the ventilator "solution" and remdesivir. All of this produced the huge spike in Covid deaths. Key point: None (or very few) of these deaths were happening before the lockdowns ... although millions of people had no doubt already been exposed to this novel virus.

.... Or, third possibility: There wasn't a novel new virus (or one anyone should fear), but they made it look like there had been - which is even a more massive and shocking/audacious scandal/crime.

Expand full comment

All three are true but there was never any significant spike in covid deaths. Ventilator use and Remdesivir did not produce the huge spike in Covid deaths. They were iatrogenic causes of death. (You know this)

Expand full comment

Speaking of Hydroxychloroquine again: I know a pharmacist who received a large delivery of hydroxychloroquine at his pharmacy without him even ordering it in Dec of 2019. He called his supplier and told them about the "error". The supplier told him, "keep it, you'll be needing it".

Expand full comment

Also look at what happened to the Shermans in Canada, murdered...left hanging over their indoor pool! The Shermans knew what they were laying down & wanted no part of it!

Trudeau and his ilk need to be jailed for our safety!

Expand full comment

god... horrible

Expand full comment

Agreed, it seems suspicious that Barry would not go along with the governments "drug plan" and ends up dead. As an aside, a neighbor's son dated the Sherman's daughter and was questioned by police but released (didn't have anything to do with the murder).

Expand full comment

They never got a big spike in deaths. It was a nothing burger. They tried to make it out like there was one and the public bought it for the most part, but there wasn't.

Expand full comment

They needed a virus that was not extremely contagious (R0 of 2.5 initially) and not very deadly (98% survival rate) and then needed to hype the panic by doing things that were completely wrong (Nursing home disasters, Remsevire, ventilators, no Ivermectin or HCQ, etc) to make it seem worse than it was.

If it was a virus that was as contagious at they claimed, it would have burned itself out very quickly (with more initial deaths). They also needed a Positive Sense RNA virus that would mutate to new strains in order to keep it alive for 3+ years now. They also needed an ineffective vaccine that allowed the spread to continue and cause more mutations (the WHO pandemic playbook or 2019 says you never vaccinate during a pandemic).

They couldn't have done anything more wrong for prevention or more right for success of infections than they did.

Expand full comment

Reid, This is nicely done. I am spreading it around...we'll see if we get some traction.

Expand full comment

Thanks! I hope so.

Expand full comment

It so doesn't matter what so called justifications existed or exist; the stated purpose built directly into the framework of the contracts by which the de facto government service agencies are enabled lays out the responsibility to perform very specific, limited functions on our behalf and to guarantee and to protect our RIGHTS. It has never been their jurisdiction or within their scope of responsibility to protect our "health". Why do people continue to enable that the racketeering fraudsters who have broken their explicit contract (Constitutions) not to mention the social contract by failing to recognize that they seized a power that was never theirs to wield in the first place? Failure to object is to consent to it; this is how the Laws of the Universe have been inverted and used against us for as long as they have been......the new default is the inaction, and the silence. As long as focus remains on following different threads unravelling without addressing the origin of the issue itself, real solutions can not be found. Where attention goes, energy flows.

Expand full comment

You are so right that failure to object is taken as consent, and that applies to everything Woke that's been foisted upon us the past couple decades. We must all speak up and we have to get involved in local politics, school councils, community committees, all of it but most especially about our healthcare systems, which are not designed to give citizens any input so we need to do our own research and speak up for ourselves, plus always take a clear-thinking advocate with us if we ever need to go to a hospital.

Expand full comment

This is what I wrote to a friend in early 2021:

"Do you know that my chances of dying of covid (given the age and comorbidities) is roughly the same as the chance of me dying while playing ping pong?

So what is going on? Do people still understand the most basic mathematics or has fear totally erased their cognitive faculties?

(Only official, publicly available and undisputed numbers, division, and multiplication were used in this analysis)"

Expand full comment

Interestingly, surveys showed that left-leaning people massively over-estimated their chances of dying from Covid. They bought into the brainwashing 110%.

Expand full comment

So ... who is giving Fatal Fauci a humanitarian award for saving millions and millions of people from Covid death! I’ll say it again, I believe this medical massive con job was orchestrated with the help of the DOD/Barda, along with big Pharma goal of creating RNA injections as the new form of medical treatment for disease dates, and was supported by the goals of gates and gang and WEF and Schwab! Let’s not forget that Donald Trump wanted the vaccine industry investigated for their role in the creation of autism and SIDS!

Expand full comment

Basically more people died from the government reaction to COVID-19...

...if you add suicide and drug over dose, along with spiritual death and long term effects on children closing schools, COVID deaths only a fraction.

The overreaction was initiated at Event201, where they war gamed 250,000,000 deaths to warrant their pandemic response.

Expand full comment

Pete: Over 100 million will die from the reaction. The WHO predicted 140 million would die from supply chain disruptions secondary to the lockdowns, let alone the moratoria placed on all but elective surgery.

Expand full comment

Getting this out on some platforms. Pandemic my foot. 🤬🤬

Expand full comment

Thank you, Tim.

Expand full comment

Loyola Chicago, Ill, USA reported that over 50% of covid deaths in their hospital were untreated pneumonia. about 1/3 of the young people I know who had covid were subsequently diagnosed with mycoplasma pneumonia. Zithromax is one of the drugs of choice for m. pneumonia and amazingly was found to greatly reduce "covid deaths".

Expand full comment

Azithromycin kills all kinds of bacterial pneumonias. That's why we included it in the IVM and HCQ treatment protocols.

Expand full comment