This came out 8 months after my video with Dr. Bhattacharya in which I made the same claim. What I like about it is that Dr. Rancourt came to the same conclusion I did but he did so using a completely different approach. He used All-Cause Mortality data while I used a more first principles approach, comparing the exaggerated and false COVID death data in the US to a country that only minimally exaggerated their Data- Sweden. When two solid lines of reasoning come to the same conclusion, that's strong evidence the conclusion is correct.
As you know Dr Sheftall ,I don't paint inside the lines for the most part . You are someone whose judgement I trust and with your question from your previous post, it gave me pause and had to think about the most important people during this whole on going battle about so called safe and effective injections . For me, it was my "own distrust" of the idea of mandated injections - the idea makes my skin crawl so that was #1 and then in those early days I watched a whole series by Jonathan Otto ( even bought his videos )to look at in my own time because I was blown away by people I had never heard of before who were questioning the whole narrative . Like all good Jack Russells, I went down the rabbit hole of each and everyone of the people in his videos and then Ifound more and more who somehow made sense with respect to what is going on . I have come to the conclusion , I like those who aren't afraid to tear off the band aid . Pretty sure this adds absolutely nothing to your project, but I appreciate all you are doing to get information out there .
Your instincts about rejecting mandates were spot on. It it was helpful, they would not have had to threaten people with their jobs, bribe peoploe with lottery tickets, pay employers to get their employees to take the shot, etc.
Thank you. I'll check him out. I listened to JJ Couey last week for the first time. I found him very hard to follow. It didn't help that he talked about something I didn't know anything about
He is worth a follow because he is tearing the band aid off and has an expertise that most don't have . Gotta get all you smart like anything people in the same room ... I often wonder if there is a lot of bickering going on with those who are all about the safe and effective narrative or are they going to the bank with their funding grants for the next best thing offered to mankind ?
While my mind was searching for people, it occurred to me that I don't exactly know what you mean by proof.
- Is it publishing a paper? If so peer reviewed or uploaded to an archive? Keeping in mind that peer reviewed publishing anything going against the narrative was impossible and much delayed at best.
- Is it presentation? If so, scientific or layman? Bhakdi did a lot of both. Henrion-Caude (geneticist) did a few fantastic scientific presentations, including on the history (with references all along) of the failed attempts to use mRNA to cure anything, mostly rare and ultra rare diseases. Unfortunately, I don't have the timeline in memory.
So, please, could you specify what you mean by proof?
Also, in addition, how do we save people in a situation like this? Rushing to publish something that may or may not get out in to the public domain, let alone in the clinic (which has been a long-term issue with most life science research)? Or by speaking to the public directly and warning them in layman terms? Or any other ways?
A PROOF is an argument that establishes the truth of a statement. So when I say, "I proved we reached herd immunity to the Wuhan strain on January 11, 2021 without a single person fully-vaccinated", I have changed the statement, "We reached herd immunity to the Wuhan strain on January 11, 2021 without a single person fully-vaccinated", from a mere claim to a factual truth.
That particular proof was very important to the understanding of the disease going forward. It also exposed the MDTV Mafia (Jonathan Reiner, Leana Wen, Sanjay Gupta, Anthony Fauci, Willian Haseltine, etc.) as incorrect on the claims they made that we needed 90% of the population vaccinated to reach herd immunity (Biden claimed 98%), in their attempt to get more people to agree to the vaccine.
Please, please do not overlook, in blessed memory, Kary Mullis, who likely died due to his protestations about his PCR test being implemented for this type of testing.
In his memory.....
Plus, Dr. James Thorpe is an absolutely wonderful, caring doctor. He must be considered.
Well, if you're looking for those who provided proof, there's Jikky/Arkmedic -- so a mouse on your cover!
Absolute proof: The Gp-120 sequences prove beyond all doubt that "COVID-19" was man-made.
The "missing link" was there in Pradhan's paper all along, we just needed to ask the right question: "where are the genome sequences for the Gp-120 inserts"
I agree with you. Prashant Pradhan found the sequences and the other guys told the public the significance of it. Jikky and Arkmedic also great for many reasons.
Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2
Dear Editor
If children, young adults and others can mount their own effective immune response to SARS-CoV2, is it ethical to impede their ability to access natural immunity by interfering with the natural progression of the virus?
According to the WHO, "Illness due to COVID-19 infection is generally mild, especially for children and young adults."[1]
Is the focus on future fast-tracked vaccine products blocking full consideration of the opportunity for natural herd immunity? Who is Neil Ferguson to say "The only exit strategy [in the] long term for this is really vaccination or other forms of innovative technology that allows us to control transmission".[2]
In regards to young people's and others' right to natural immunity, it's also vital to consider the startling admission by Heidi Larson, Director of The Vaccine Confidence Project, during the recent WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, i.e. "...We've shifted the human population...to dependency on vaccine-induced immunity...We're in a very fragile state now. We have developed a world that is dependent on vaccinations".[3]
This is a very alarming statement by Professor Larson, particularly with the prospect of other epidemics emerging in the future. We have to learn to deal with epidemics and illnesses as they emerge, it's not feasible to vaccinate the global population against every threat.
In a recent article raising concern about making decisions about this pandemic without reliable data, John Ioannidis notes that "School closures may also diminish the chances of developing herd immunity in an age group that is spared serious disease".[4] The UK's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, raised the prospect of developing natural herd immunity[5], but this idea was subsequently howled down by Matt Hancock, the UK secretary of state for health and social care[6], and others such as Willem van Schaik, a professor of microbiology and infection, as reported by the Science Media Centre.[7]
Again, is it ethical to deny children, young people and others their opportunity for natural immunity, and to plan to make them dependent on vaccine-induce immunity, to in effect make them dependent on the vaccine industry?
This is even more serious to consider in light of emerging vaccine product failures, e.g. pertussis and mumps.
The international community must be assured that independent and objective thinkers are carefully considering the way ahead on this matter.
References:
1. WHO Q&A on coronaviruses (COVID-19) - Should I worry about COVID-19. 9 March 2020.
2. Elisabeth Mahase. Covid-19: UK starts social distancing after new model points to 260 000 potential deaths. BMJ2020;368:m1089
3. Heidi Larson. Vaccine safety in the next decade. Why we need new modes of trust building? WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, 2-3 December 2019.
4. John P.A. Ioannidis. A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data. STAT, 17 March 2020.
5. Coronavirus: 60% of UK population need to become infected so country can build 'herd immunity', government's chief scientist says. Independent, 13 March 2020.
6. The UK backs away from "herd immunity" coronavirus proposal amid blowback. Vox, 15 March 2020.
7. Expert comments about herd immunity. Science Media Centre, 13 March 2020.
Competing interests: No competing interests
25 March 2020
Elizabeth M Hart
Independent citizen investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
Thank you very much for that, Elizabeth. One thing I don't understand is, how did they deny children, young people and others their opportunity for natural immunity? Certainly not by putting everyone into lockdowns although basically everyone- doctors and other medical people included- thought that is what they would do. Still almost everyone thinks lockdowns keep people separated from each other and therefore from getting infected. It makes sense on first glance but it's not true. I've been beating people over the head with this for over 3 years and nobody seems to get it. Dr. B and myself argued over this for an hour on two of our podcasts. I couldn't convince him but I heard him the other day say lockdowns reduced spread only a little (like the Johns Hopkins study concluded (but they were wrong too).; that it hurt the poor and didn't hurt the "laptop class".
Can you imagine the intelligence Bhakdi has to be able to speak Thai, German and English so fluently? I particularly love how he can explain difficult concepts to us in words we understand...and I especially loved his pencil through the paper example.
Well, Didier kinda proved it in the actual numbers of people he treated, but not on paper, no. And since you won't put yourself on the cover....well...I'm out of ideas...Ionnides did something like this....but of course, no one paid any attention to him either.
I'm sure he looked it up, but it doesn't negate his genius....anyone who has ever been to Africa and come back with a parasite adores this man...me being one of them.
In parallel, there was a Hungarian doctor (I think it was a couple) living in Australia who "discovered" IVM, very early on but I don't have the exact timeline.
If I remember correctly the in vitro studies of IVM killing 99.9% of the virus in 24 hours (or something like that) came on the scene in June or July of 2020
Also, I'd love to have a request. Once you're done with the book, would you be willing to look into the virus isolation question? And perhaps connect with Drs Andy Kaufman, Tom Cowan, Baileys and Stafan Lanka (if you speak German as his English is frustratingly poor).
So many heroes. I bless Reid Shefthall for cataloging them so they will not be forgotten. Likewise the villains. Cannot wait for his revised book to come out.
I hope you can add a few chapters on getting the United States OUT of the World Health Organization. I see a that organization as a noose that will slowly be tightened around our collective necks. Our doctors must decide how to treat their own patients in a way they seem fit, that right should and can not be pulled away by our own government leaders who are following the advise of the WHO
You were perhaps late to the party? After all else had been cancelled?
Dr Vernon Coleman - masks, lockdowns everything else
Richie Allen radio
Prof Dolores Cahill
Dr Judy Mikovits
Dr Joseph Mercola
Dr Richard Chang
Meryl Dorey
Del Bigtree etc etc etc
And me except I don't have an audience 😂
I said in August 2020 that in 5 years time 75% of the vax (actually world) population will be dead. Do the maths. 10% year on year excess deaths and 10% birth rate reduction. Doesn't take long. But no-one wants to publicly say this, all that's said is why, how do we stop this. Imho little of it is stoppable (delayed, yes) and it has an increasing propensity to accelerate with the high vax rate in all emergency and public services, on repeat. Society very quickly breaks down.
Name who you like, anyone with common sense saw through the whole thing way back at the start. Some of us were on it in October 2019, you could feel something change even in what was already a corrupt system.
No, I wasn't too late to the party. I was too early. I made my claims before the data came out. I was the first to prove the things I listed. Remember, you have to prove things. Just predicting something is not enough. Nobody is going to change a policy that applies to an individual or to the world unless you can convince them you're right. People predict things all the time. Some will get them right. Most will get them wrong. If you say in August of 2020, "75% of the group who got the vaccine will be dead," people are going to ask you how you know that. If you can't convince them you are right, either they are too dumb to understand or there's something wrong with your line of reasoning.
It's not true that "anyone with common sense saw through the whole thing way back at the start." Almost everyone believed all of it. Read the comments below the 'falling man' videos. . Every commenter believed them. Look at all the people who wore masks and lost their jobs at enormous financial loss to them. Every sign said, "Stay Home, Save Lives". One doctor made a video about virus transmission that got 6 million views and he was totally wrong. Sanjay Gupta made videos about how to wipe down your groceries before bringing them into the house and had his daughter make cloth masks for everybody! People threw hot coffee in the faces of the people who put their mask under their chin to eat lunch outside! A few people had suspicions about the Narrative but they couldn't prove anything. You needed medical expertise and a physics background to disprove some of the early claims by the government and the CDC. When someone made a video or a post that got at the truth through a logical argument, the government just took it down. It was incredibly frustrating. People have forgotten how much in fear the population was. How could anyone be on it in October 2019? There had been no information released about a virus in the human population. That didn't happen until December, 3 months later. Later, samples were analyzed and yes, they showed the virus was in several far away (from Wuhan) places in October but there wasn't a single person in the world who made the diagnosis back then. They thought it was the flu.
Denis Rancourt: https://denisrancourt.ca/uploads_entries/1687643289487_Denis%20Rancourt%20essay%20-%20There%20Was%20No%20Pandemic%20-%20pub.pdf
This came out 8 months after my video with Dr. Bhattacharya in which I made the same claim. What I like about it is that Dr. Rancourt came to the same conclusion I did but he did so using a completely different approach. He used All-Cause Mortality data while I used a more first principles approach, comparing the exaggerated and false COVID death data in the US to a country that only minimally exaggerated their Data- Sweden. When two solid lines of reasoning come to the same conclusion, that's strong evidence the conclusion is correct.
Here's the video:
Don't worry, Matt. Dr. Rancourt plays a prominent role in the lists of the Revision.
As you know Dr Sheftall ,I don't paint inside the lines for the most part . You are someone whose judgement I trust and with your question from your previous post, it gave me pause and had to think about the most important people during this whole on going battle about so called safe and effective injections . For me, it was my "own distrust" of the idea of mandated injections - the idea makes my skin crawl so that was #1 and then in those early days I watched a whole series by Jonathan Otto ( even bought his videos )to look at in my own time because I was blown away by people I had never heard of before who were questioning the whole narrative . Like all good Jack Russells, I went down the rabbit hole of each and everyone of the people in his videos and then Ifound more and more who somehow made sense with respect to what is going on . I have come to the conclusion , I like those who aren't afraid to tear off the band aid . Pretty sure this adds absolutely nothing to your project, but I appreciate all you are doing to get information out there .
Jonathan Otto. I'll look him up.
Your instincts about rejecting mandates were spot on. It it was helpful, they would not have had to threaten people with their jobs, bribe peoploe with lottery tickets, pay employers to get their employees to take the shot, etc.
Jonathan was a kind and gentle type of approach and was great as I started my research. https://jonathanotto.tv/
I've now worked my way up to JJ Couey since he holds no bars : https://twitter.com/Inquiry_Canada/status/1676241773067157507 .
Thank you. I'll check him out. I listened to JJ Couey last week for the first time. I found him very hard to follow. It didn't help that he talked about something I didn't know anything about
He is worth a follow because he is tearing the band aid off and has an expertise that most don't have . Gotta get all you smart like anything people in the same room ... I often wonder if there is a lot of bickering going on with those who are all about the safe and effective narrative or are they going to the bank with their funding grants for the next best thing offered to mankind ?
Oh rest assured, they're going to the bank.
While my mind was searching for people, it occurred to me that I don't exactly know what you mean by proof.
- Is it publishing a paper? If so peer reviewed or uploaded to an archive? Keeping in mind that peer reviewed publishing anything going against the narrative was impossible and much delayed at best.
- Is it presentation? If so, scientific or layman? Bhakdi did a lot of both. Henrion-Caude (geneticist) did a few fantastic scientific presentations, including on the history (with references all along) of the failed attempts to use mRNA to cure anything, mostly rare and ultra rare diseases. Unfortunately, I don't have the timeline in memory.
So, please, could you specify what you mean by proof?
Also, in addition, how do we save people in a situation like this? Rushing to publish something that may or may not get out in to the public domain, let alone in the clinic (which has been a long-term issue with most life science research)? Or by speaking to the public directly and warning them in layman terms? Or any other ways?
That's a very good question, yulia.
A PROOF is an argument that establishes the truth of a statement. So when I say, "I proved we reached herd immunity to the Wuhan strain on January 11, 2021 without a single person fully-vaccinated", I have changed the statement, "We reached herd immunity to the Wuhan strain on January 11, 2021 without a single person fully-vaccinated", from a mere claim to a factual truth.
That particular proof was very important to the understanding of the disease going forward. It also exposed the MDTV Mafia (Jonathan Reiner, Leana Wen, Sanjay Gupta, Anthony Fauci, Willian Haseltine, etc.) as incorrect on the claims they made that we needed 90% of the population vaccinated to reach herd immunity (Biden claimed 98%), in their attempt to get more people to agree to the vaccine.
Thank you for all of your contributions!
Please, please do not overlook, in blessed memory, Kary Mullis, who likely died due to his protestations about his PCR test being implemented for this type of testing.
In his memory.....
Plus, Dr. James Thorpe is an absolutely wonderful, caring doctor. He must be considered.
Thank you!!
I agree totally on both counts, Sally. They are both listed.
Well, if you're looking for those who provided proof, there's Jikky/Arkmedic -- so a mouse on your cover!
Absolute proof: The Gp-120 sequences prove beyond all doubt that "COVID-19" was man-made.
The "missing link" was there in Pradhan's paper all along, we just needed to ask the right question: "where are the genome sequences for the Gp-120 inserts"
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/absolute-proof-the-gp-120-sequences
I agree with you. Prashant Pradhan found the sequences and the other guys told the public the significance of it. Jikky and Arkmedic also great for many reasons.
While I was "the smart one" in my family as a child, I am not smart. But I thank God I have at least
the intelligence enough to recognize truly smart people when I see them. Reid Sheftall is one.
About some things, maybe. You're too nice, Duchess
You
Thank you, Leighton but you know I can't feature myself in a book that I wrote. It wouldn't feel right to me and wouldn't look right to everyone else.
People outside the medical and scientific establishment were calling this out from the beginning...
See for example my BMJ rapid response, published in March 2020:
https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1089/rr-6
Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2
Dear Editor
If children, young adults and others can mount their own effective immune response to SARS-CoV2, is it ethical to impede their ability to access natural immunity by interfering with the natural progression of the virus?
According to the WHO, "Illness due to COVID-19 infection is generally mild, especially for children and young adults."[1]
Is the focus on future fast-tracked vaccine products blocking full consideration of the opportunity for natural herd immunity? Who is Neil Ferguson to say "The only exit strategy [in the] long term for this is really vaccination or other forms of innovative technology that allows us to control transmission".[2]
In regards to young people's and others' right to natural immunity, it's also vital to consider the startling admission by Heidi Larson, Director of The Vaccine Confidence Project, during the recent WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, i.e. "...We've shifted the human population...to dependency on vaccine-induced immunity...We're in a very fragile state now. We have developed a world that is dependent on vaccinations".[3]
This is a very alarming statement by Professor Larson, particularly with the prospect of other epidemics emerging in the future. We have to learn to deal with epidemics and illnesses as they emerge, it's not feasible to vaccinate the global population against every threat.
In a recent article raising concern about making decisions about this pandemic without reliable data, John Ioannidis notes that "School closures may also diminish the chances of developing herd immunity in an age group that is spared serious disease".[4] The UK's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, raised the prospect of developing natural herd immunity[5], but this idea was subsequently howled down by Matt Hancock, the UK secretary of state for health and social care[6], and others such as Willem van Schaik, a professor of microbiology and infection, as reported by the Science Media Centre.[7]
Again, is it ethical to deny children, young people and others their opportunity for natural immunity, and to plan to make them dependent on vaccine-induce immunity, to in effect make them dependent on the vaccine industry?
This is even more serious to consider in light of emerging vaccine product failures, e.g. pertussis and mumps.
The international community must be assured that independent and objective thinkers are carefully considering the way ahead on this matter.
References:
1. WHO Q&A on coronaviruses (COVID-19) - Should I worry about COVID-19. 9 March 2020.
2. Elisabeth Mahase. Covid-19: UK starts social distancing after new model points to 260 000 potential deaths. BMJ2020;368:m1089
3. Heidi Larson. Vaccine safety in the next decade. Why we need new modes of trust building? WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, 2-3 December 2019.
4. John P.A. Ioannidis. A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data. STAT, 17 March 2020.
5. Coronavirus: 60% of UK population need to become infected so country can build 'herd immunity', government's chief scientist says. Independent, 13 March 2020.
6. The UK backs away from "herd immunity" coronavirus proposal amid blowback. Vox, 15 March 2020.
7. Expert comments about herd immunity. Science Media Centre, 13 March 2020.
Competing interests: No competing interests
25 March 2020
Elizabeth M Hart
Independent citizen investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
Adelaide, Australia
https://vaccinationispolitical.net/
Thank you very much for that, Elizabeth. One thing I don't understand is, how did they deny children, young people and others their opportunity for natural immunity? Certainly not by putting everyone into lockdowns although basically everyone- doctors and other medical people included- thought that is what they would do. Still almost everyone thinks lockdowns keep people separated from each other and therefore from getting infected. It makes sense on first glance but it's not true. I've been beating people over the head with this for over 3 years and nobody seems to get it. Dr. B and myself argued over this for an hour on two of our podcasts. I couldn't convince him but I heard him the other day say lockdowns reduced spread only a little (like the Johns Hopkins study concluded (but they were wrong too).; that it hurt the poor and didn't hurt the "laptop class".
Sucharit Bhakdi (Germany)
John Ioannidis (Stanford)
and maybe: Alexandra Henrion-Caude (France)
and Vernon Coleman (UK)
and Mike Yeadon (UK)
Can you imagine the intelligence Bhakdi has to be able to speak Thai, German and English so fluently? I particularly love how he can explain difficult concepts to us in words we understand...and I especially loved his pencil through the paper example.
Genius. Sheer genius.
Vernon Coleman and Sucharit Bhakdi were among the first to warn us.not just of the pfraud, but about what the further plans were.
I like these two.
Didier Raoult found the combination for early treatment in Marseille ....and told the world. End of Februrary 2020.
Yes but Sheftall wants proof. I think Sucharit proved it, but not Coleman or Didier.
Exactly Yulia. In order to move our understanding forward, the nominee must have proved their claim.
Well, Didier kinda proved it in the actual numbers of people he treated, but not on paper, no. And since you won't put yourself on the cover....well...I'm out of ideas...Ionnides did something like this....but of course, no one paid any attention to him either.
Didier probably knew about the 2005 paper on Chloroquine in Sars type viruses.
NB: I don't believe in the existence of viruses; virus isolation is not done following scientific methods.
For a good paper on this, one needs to read 'Farewell to virology' and scrutinise the references, go back in time and read the methodologies utilised.
I'm sure he looked it up, but it doesn't negate his genius....anyone who has ever been to Africa and come back with a parasite adores this man...me being one of them.
In parallel, there was a Hungarian doctor (I think it was a couple) living in Australia who "discovered" IVM, very early on but I don't have the exact timeline.
If I remember correctly the in vitro studies of IVM killing 99.9% of the virus in 24 hours (or something like that) came on the scene in June or July of 2020
Again, this may or may not help to track first papers.
https://c19ivm.org/meta.html
On the middle tab, COVID-19 treatment research, you can chose any another treatment to look up.
Pierre Kory is the best authority on IVM. He has all the literature in his head now - you might want to pick his brain.
Eric Coppolino has a good Covid Chronology. It may (or may not) help to find others. https://chironreturn.org/chronology/
Also, I'd love to have a request. Once you're done with the book, would you be willing to look into the virus isolation question? And perhaps connect with Drs Andy Kaufman, Tom Cowan, Baileys and Stafan Lanka (if you speak German as his English is frustratingly poor).
So many heroes. I bless Reid Shefthall for cataloging them so they will not be forgotten. Likewise the villains. Cannot wait for his revised book to come out.
I hope you can add a few chapters on getting the United States OUT of the World Health Organization. I see a that organization as a noose that will slowly be tightened around our collective necks. Our doctors must decide how to treat their own patients in a way they seem fit, that right should and can not be pulled away by our own government leaders who are following the advise of the WHO
You were perhaps late to the party? After all else had been cancelled?
Dr Vernon Coleman - masks, lockdowns everything else
Richie Allen radio
Prof Dolores Cahill
Dr Judy Mikovits
Dr Joseph Mercola
Dr Richard Chang
Meryl Dorey
Del Bigtree etc etc etc
And me except I don't have an audience 😂
I said in August 2020 that in 5 years time 75% of the vax (actually world) population will be dead. Do the maths. 10% year on year excess deaths and 10% birth rate reduction. Doesn't take long. But no-one wants to publicly say this, all that's said is why, how do we stop this. Imho little of it is stoppable (delayed, yes) and it has an increasing propensity to accelerate with the high vax rate in all emergency and public services, on repeat. Society very quickly breaks down.
Name who you like, anyone with common sense saw through the whole thing way back at the start. Some of us were on it in October 2019, you could feel something change even in what was already a corrupt system.
That's my trumpet blowing for today 😉
No, I wasn't too late to the party. I was too early. I made my claims before the data came out. I was the first to prove the things I listed. Remember, you have to prove things. Just predicting something is not enough. Nobody is going to change a policy that applies to an individual or to the world unless you can convince them you're right. People predict things all the time. Some will get them right. Most will get them wrong. If you say in August of 2020, "75% of the group who got the vaccine will be dead," people are going to ask you how you know that. If you can't convince them you are right, either they are too dumb to understand or there's something wrong with your line of reasoning.
It's not true that "anyone with common sense saw through the whole thing way back at the start." Almost everyone believed all of it. Read the comments below the 'falling man' videos. . Every commenter believed them. Look at all the people who wore masks and lost their jobs at enormous financial loss to them. Every sign said, "Stay Home, Save Lives". One doctor made a video about virus transmission that got 6 million views and he was totally wrong. Sanjay Gupta made videos about how to wipe down your groceries before bringing them into the house and had his daughter make cloth masks for everybody! People threw hot coffee in the faces of the people who put their mask under their chin to eat lunch outside! A few people had suspicions about the Narrative but they couldn't prove anything. You needed medical expertise and a physics background to disprove some of the early claims by the government and the CDC. When someone made a video or a post that got at the truth through a logical argument, the government just took it down. It was incredibly frustrating. People have forgotten how much in fear the population was. How could anyone be on it in October 2019? There had been no information released about a virus in the human population. That didn't happen until December, 3 months later. Later, samples were analyzed and yes, they showed the virus was in several far away (from Wuhan) places in October but there wasn't a single person in the world who made the diagnosis back then. They thought it was the flu.