Note to Criminals: Stop Using Emails!
I think most of you have heard about the uncovering of emails between Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci regarding the Great Barrington Declaration of October 20, 2019.
Since their discovery, Collins and Fauci are doubling down as might be expected. This needs to be pursued to the nth degree because there’s really no way out for Collins and Fauci on this. If they had admitted to anything less than still feeling that the three authors of the GBD were “fringe epidemiologists” in the words of Collins, they would be admitting to trying to manipulate the Covid-19 debacle to their advantage as agreeing to the principles contained therein now would confirm their out-and out criminal activity in being engaged in a cover-up of their activities in Wuhan and elsewhere.
For those of you who don’t remember, upon hearing of the GBD, Collins sent emails to Fauci and others (Cliff Lane and Lawrence Tabak) immediately. Read them for yourselves:
The reactions and remedies of Drs. Collins and Fauci (major lockdown proponents and deeply involved in the origins of the virus and vaccines) are laughable on many levels: 1. Referring to Harvard, Stanford and Oxford epidemiologists as “fringe” (they’re far from “fringe”- watch any interview of any of the three), 2. Collins saying “there needs to be a quick and devastating published takedown of the premises (of the GBD). I don’t see anything like that online yet- is there any underway?” NO mention of science from Collins here- not even a ‘we’ve proved that the lockdowns have been helpful, and these authors want to remove them’… just what appears to start as a smear campaign against the “fringe” epidemiologists via a “devastating takedown”, “ published online”. , 3. Fauci’s remedy, an opinion piece published in Wired magazine, hardly a scientific journal and utterly devoid of data questioning the premises of the GBD, let alone a “takedown”. (I’m pretty open-minded when it comes to hearing out less sophisticated sources of science but an opinion piece in a popular magazine is meant to sway the public rather than to live by any rigorous standard of scientific debate among serious policymakers, just shows you where their motivations were at the time, especially when Dr. Collins responds by referring to the piece in Wired as, “Indeed and well-said”.
Then another opinion piece in The Nation weekly magazine. This magazine, self-described as, “Principled. Progressive. The Nation speaks truth to power to build a more just society…”. ‘Truth to power’ is great, but these three GBD epidemiologists aren’t some bureaucrats weilding power over the masses for personal gain. In fact they had nothing to gain by authoring the Declaration and frankly, the “power” in this scenario is wielded by Dr. Collins who was heading the NIH at the time and funded the gain of function research and origins of the virus through the Eco Health Alliance and Dr. Fauci, head of the NIAID and also a major player in the funding . The Nation and the author of this opinion piece, the prolific AIDS activist, Gregg Gonsalves, have it backwards.
“Home to tenacious muckraking, provocative commentary, and spirited debate about politics and culture, The Nation empowers readers to fight for justice and equality for all. By providing a deeper understanding of the world as it is—and as it could be—we drive bold ideas into the conversation and ignite debates far beyond our pages”. “politics and culture”?? -exactly…
From someone who has claimed that, “attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science”- that same someone who is about as far from a scientific person as you could imagine, who majored in “the Classics” at Holy Cross and hasn’t taken care of a patient in about 40 years- (more on this in my book), this is pretty clearly the launch of a public relations campaign , and dare I say it, part of a cover-up of their roles in this deadly scheme of virus and vaccine creation that clearly got completely out of their control very early at the hands of Peter Daszak of the ECH and the scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The plot will thicken if people pursue this. I intend to, as Dr. Collins, who has since stepped down as NIH Director, has been making the liberal mainstream network talkshow rounds, claiming that the three epidemiologists were not qualified to make the case for a directed approach aimed at protecting the vulnerable, while letting the working age population go about their lives and end the clearly destructive lockdowns.. for a disease that had demonstrated an Infection Fatality Rate of .05% (that’s less than the overall IFR for the seasonal flu, folks) in those under 70 years of age by the time the Declaration was published, let alone for the 65-and-under working age group… on top of lockdowns that showed and continue to show no flattening of the curve for any country at any time, lockdowns that have caused devastation on a biblical scale.
Stay tuned. This is a serious problem for the people involved in the origin of this “novel coronavirus”. It was novel, alright.
NOTE: in my paid Subscribers section of Substack, I will begin publishing the first draft ofmy book “If They had Only Listened: How I Cracked the Most Egregious Crime in Medical History” tomorrow. Please subscribe and encourage your contacts to subscribe, no matter what side of the political fence you sit on. You can do so for as little as $7 a month. I’d like to keep the price low like this but it will require a lot of subscribers.
Merry Christmas, everyone!