An Eye-Opening Deposition

Dr. Stanley Plotkin is deposed.

Dr. Stanley Plotkin is a world-renowned vaccinologist who was one of three inventors (with Fred Clark and Paul Offit) of one of two rotavirus vaccines in wide use.

He is deposed in a case of a father who is suing the mother of his daughter, Faith. The mother did not get the daughter vaccinated against several diseases and the father is suing to have the child vaccinated.

Dr. Plotkin is an expert witness who made the mistake of saying without reservation that he recommends the child get all of the vaccinations if there are no contra indications. This opened a can of worms, of course, because it allowed the lawyer to look at the way those vaccines got approved by the FDA and CDC, one with a follow-up for adverse events of only 48 hours (and even then with a long list of horrible complications)- most with only 4 or 5 days of follow-up- and some with no control group exposing the underbelly of vaccine approval in these corrupt organizations, full of conflicts of interest.

It’s a long , 13 plus hour deposition, so just watch 30 minutes or so starting at 3:16::00.

Here is the comment I wrote under it: “I’m not a blanket anti-vaxxer but I am vehemently against the mod RNA vaccines used against Covid as the first person to show they did not block transmission and one of several who warned of safety issues before they were released. Nevertheless, I am shocked to learn how little Dr. Plotkin knows about how the immune system works. He couldn't even describe how T cells recognize a host cell that has been infected by virus. He did disclose the tremendous conflict of interest of Dr. Offit voting on rotavirus approval when he, himself, held patents on a rotavirus vaccine. A very eye-opening deposition. The entire vaccine industry has to be cleaned up. It is full of nefarious practices. Some don't even get monitored for adverse reactions for more than 4 days (even 48 hours for the IPV (polio) vaccine) and even then, they didn't use an inert placebo in the control group or in some cases, there was no control group!! What a disgrace! The basic method is they approve the vaccines with no control group after 4 days of observation for adverse events (loaded with adverse reactions). Then they say you can't prove causation in 4 days (which is true). At that point, the only way to determine causation is by performing a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. But it is unethical to perform such a trial on a baby or child on a approved vaccine! Absolutely disgraceful. Very well done by the lawyer.”

Give it a thumbs up if you agree.

Here’s the video:

And here’s another clip from the same interview that will absolutely BLOW YOUR MIND . One lady in the comments asks, “Why isn’t he in jail?”: